Yet another site test :)

[khaag]

So if you guys havn't guessed already, I'm a graphic design student. I got another site for you to test in your browsers. Screencaps if possible!

http://digitalartanddesign.net/joomla/khaag/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[vskid]

The best of the sites you've had us test. The border on the right side is cut off, but all the content is visible without scrolling sideways.
You really need to reduce your resolution to 1024x768 to see what your sites look like.

[gamemasterAS]

Too small

[joeyjoe9876]

i get the same results as vskid

[khaag]

Gamemaster, I lol'd. Why the good eff do you have your resolution set to that ridiculous size? :p

Glad this one seems to be working better, I'm definitely improving as I go. My biggest issue seems to be the size of things.

[budnespid]

Looks good, a little wide though.

[gamemasterAS]

Gamemaster, I lol'd. Why the good eff do you have your resolution set to that ridiculous size? :p

Glad this one seems to be working better, I'm definitely improving as I go. My biggest issue seems to be the size of things.

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e393/ ... 010921.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[bicostp]

Spoiler:

Fix it.





There's a few problems under Opera 10.51 at 1024x768:

Spoiler:

The layout's narrow enough to fit, but it's pushed too far to the right for some reason.

[kingpin901]

Firefox 3.6.2
Windows XP SP3
Resolution: 1680x1050
Looks great!
Maybe you could resize the background so there's no black border when viewing on a wide-screen resolution.
Great work and keep on going

[smitty]

IE 5.5: The big picture in the middle of the screen didn't change automatically on this one. And I was too lazy to see if it would change if I moused over or clicked on the other ones.

Firefox 2:

And of course, the browser I actually use, Google Chrome:

vskid's right, you really should try to optimize your designs for 1024x768, that's a pretty average size.

[ghosstt]

While it seems like an average screen resolution, only about 20% use it.

http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[smitty]

Interesting, but that link just seems kind of weird. Once we're into a recession, the percentage of Mac users go up? But if the screen resolution thing at least is correct, I'm in small percentages all around. 20% for screen res, 3% for 24-bit color, and 4.6% for Linux. Thanks for the info, ghostt.

[bicostp]

While it seems like an average screen resolution, only about 20% use it.

Netbooks are typically around 1024x600...

Besides, if you're going to say "only 20% use it", then why bother testing with Firefox 3? It "only" has about 25% share. Or Opera and WebKit? Combined they only have about 15% share. It's bad form to make a website that's broken for 1 out of every 5 people who visit it.

http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[smitty]

I like bicostp's link better. Even if most resolutions ar higher than 1080x740, it's actually the most popular resolution. So HAH.