In fact I have, but that's beside the point. I found it just as unappealing when I went to the apple store on tuesday to have my iPod 5gen servied. It's still ugly as sin. Design is a fundamental, and if it doesn't work on paper or on a screen, it doesn't work. The ipod is flat, this makes it even less subject to change when in real life.theelk wrote:Have you held one in real life? I thought it was ugly in the pictures, but then I saw and held one in real life, and it's really not that bad. And video has never been a problem on such a small screen for me.Lucretius wrote:Couple things of importance:
-The iPod nano is ugly as sin. Incidentally, this is because the broke a fundamental law of design known as the Principle of Unequal Spacing, which is enhanced in a vertical layout, as seen in he iPod nano. This even break of the ipod, plus the oversized screen plus the undersized scroll-wheel is what makes it look ugly as sin.
As for the touch. It seems really super, but I'll wait for 20gb or 30 gb. My tastes are too wide for just 16gb. Though that 160gb clasic is REALLY appealing!